Rekonstruksi Praktik Pembelajaran Berbasis Data: Integrasi Temuan Asesmen dan Keputusan Pedagogis Guru Seni Budaya di SMA
Keywords:
pembelajaran berbasis data, asesmen, keputusan pedagogis, Seni Budaya, praktik pembelajaranAbstract
Pembelajaran berbasis data semakin dipromosikan sebagai pendekatan strategis untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran di sekolah menengah, termasuk pada mata pelajaran Seni Budaya. Namun, dalam praktiknya, integrasi temuan asesmen ke dalam pengambilan keputusan pedagogis guru masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi praktik pembelajaran berbasis data dengan mengkaji bagaimana guru Seni Budaya di SMA memanfaatkan hasil asesmen dalam merancang dan melaksanakan pembelajaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan metode campuran dengan desain sequential explanatory, yang mengombinasikan data kuantitatif melalui angket dan data kualitatif melalui wawancara, observasi, serta analisis dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun guru telah melaksanakan asesmen secara rutin, pemanfaatan data asesmen masih didominasi oleh kepentingan administratif dan evaluasi hasil belajar, belum sepenuhnya berfungsi sebagai dasar refleksi dan pengambilan keputusan pedagogis. Keterbatasan literasi asesmen, beban administrasi, alokasi waktu pembelajaran, serta minimnya pendampingan profesional kontekstual menjadi faktor utama yang memengaruhi kondisi tersebut. Penelitian ini menawarkan model konseptual integrasi data asesmen dan keputusan pedagogis yang menekankan pentingnya penguatan literasi asesmen guru, desain pembelajaran adaptif, refleksi pedagogis kolaboratif, dan dukungan struktural dari sekolah. Temuan ini memiliki implikasi kebijakan dalam upaya reposisi asesmen sebagai instrumen pedagogis yang bermakna, khususnya pada mata pelajaran Seni Budaya yang menekankan proses kreatif dan keunikan capaian belajar siswa
Downloads
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Corwin Press.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2015). On your mark: Challenging the conventions of grading and reporting. Solution Tree Press.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Herppich, S., Praetorius, A. K., Förster, N., Glogger-Frey, I., Karst, K., Leutner, D., Behrmann, L., & Klieme, E. (2018). Teachers’ assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 181–193.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan asesmen pembelajaran pada satuan pendidikan. Kemendikbudristek.
Klenowski, V. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 78–83.
Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). What does it mean for teachers to be data literate: Laying out the skills, knowledge, and dispositions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 366–376.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.). Pearson.
Remesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 472–482.
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758–765.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433–449.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Integrating data-based decision making, assessment for learning, and diagnostic testing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(3), 324–343.
Wayman, J. C., & Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 25–34.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment (pp. 53–82). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Winner, E., Goldstein, T. R., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education. OECD Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323–342.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ahmad fikri fikri, alfathul mukarrom alfathul (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
